User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11A465 Safari/9537.53 (compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesBing Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingBotBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.17907 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesbingbotclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 7.0closeiPhone OS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.09104 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingBot 2.0WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42017 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBingclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesbingbotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser