User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/6.0.24093/36.1444; U; uk) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 6.0JAVA unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.0.24093closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19208 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.0.24093close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.0.24093close closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.0.24093close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.0.24093Presto 2.12.423 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40916 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 2.12.423 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.5close OperaMini 6Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser