User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; ABrowse 0.7; Syllable) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-syllable.yaml
ABrowse 0.7Syllable Webkit 420desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ABrowse 0.7closeSyllable desktop-browsercloseclose0.18808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ABrowse 0.7WebKit Syllable desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse 0.7closeSyllable closecloseclosecloseclose0.05602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 420 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52221 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ABrowse 0.7Webkit 420Syllable desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser