User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; GrapeshotCrawler/2.0; +http://www.grapeshot.co.uk/crawler.php)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-051.php
GrapeshotCrawler 2.0 yesGrapeshotCrawlerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGrapeshotCrawlerBot/Crawler0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGrapeshotCrawler/2.0close0.18808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGrapeshotCrawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
PHP close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14406 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Grapeshot Bot 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40616 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser