User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100728 Turbolinux/3.5.11-1 Firefox/3.5.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.5.11Turbolinux 3.5Gecko 1.9.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.16598 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18535 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06713 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.11Gecko 20100728Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.58611 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.11Gecko 1.9.1Turbolinux 3.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:27 | by ThaDafinser