User agent detail

W3C_I18n-Checker/1.0 (http://validator.w3.org/services)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesW3C I18n CheckerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesW3C I18n CheckerBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
W3C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesW3C Internationalization Checkerclose0.19437 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesW3C I18N CheckerValidator0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesW3C Internationalization Checkerclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:27 | by ThaDafinser