User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; LG Google TV G3 TV Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.62 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 29Google TV Blink 537.36LGG3 seriestelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.2625 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2LGGoogle TV G3 TVsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2LGGoogle TV G3 TVcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06913 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.62WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40877 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Google TV LGG3 seriestelevisioncloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.62closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.17898 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:27 | by ThaDafinser