User agent detail

nApps (LG-F160S; 16; naversearchapp; 5.0.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGF160S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
nApps closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGF160S;mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19938 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGF160Ssmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGF160Scloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGF160Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37772 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGF160S;mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:26 | by ThaDafinser