User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android Custom 2.3.3 by Snegovik; ru-ru; LG-P500.RU Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP500.RU Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08799 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.34365 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LGP500.RUsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid LGP500.RUcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.05911 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android LGLG Optimus Onecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40777 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3LGOptimus Onemobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06399 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:26 | by ThaDafinser