User agent detail

WAP Browser-Karbonn K84/1.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
KarbonnK84feature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WAP closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close KarbonnK84mobile-browseryescloseclose0.48091 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
KarbonnK84feature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Karbonn Mobilescloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42982 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
KarbonnK84mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:26 | by ThaDafinser