User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFTT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/2.0 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=false
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 2.0WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes0.08199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.25649 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 2.0Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 2.0closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07114 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 2.0WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40477 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 2.0Webkit 535.19FireOS 2AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKFTTTabletyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:26 | by ThaDafinser