User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; TERRA_7oW Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.1unknown GOCLEVERTerra 7oWTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.1GOCLEVERTerra 7oWTabletyesyes0.13499 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.29857 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.1.1TERRA_7oWcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07414 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41078 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.1.1TERRA_7oWtabletyescloseclose0.07801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:26 | by ThaDafinser