User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; U55GT Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.76 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-851.php
Chrome 46.0Android 4.2unknown CubeTalk 79 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.2CubeTalk 79 3GTabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27151 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.2CubeTalk 79tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeAndroid 4.2.2CubeU55GTcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.1062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41378 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Android 4.2.2CubeU55GTtabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 46closeAndroid 4.2CubeU55GTTabletyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:25 | by ThaDafinser