User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Archos 101 Xenon Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 32.0.1700.99Android 4.2.2Blink Archos101 Xenontablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.20298 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.48469 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Archos101 Xenontabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2Archos101 Xenoncloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.36302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.84671 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2Archos101 Xenontabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 32closeAndroid 4.2Archos101 XenonTabletyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:25 | by ThaDafinser