User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; ru) Presto/2.5.24 Version/10.53
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.53Presto 2.2WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.53closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose1.30547 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.53Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.53closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.53closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.53closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.62231 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.53Presto 2.5.24Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.84172 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 10.53Presto 2.5.24Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.53closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:24 | by ThaDafinser