User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; G Watch Build/KNX01Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) WIB/0.9.8 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/watch/os-android-wear.yaml
Wear Internet Browser 0.9.8Android Wear Webkit 537.36LGG Watchwatchyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.4GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.48967 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4closeAndroid 4.4G Watchcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.58342 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.36Android 4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose1.23466 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Wear Internet Browser 0.9.8Webkit 537.36Android Wear LGG Watchwatchyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.14399 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:24 | by ThaDafinser