User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 LG-GM750 Browser/IE8.12 MMS/LGMMSv1.0/1.2 Java/LGVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.8.0.95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGM750 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.05599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.52258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Windows CE LGGM750smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeWindows CE LGGM750closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.46973 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59938 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile LGLayla GM750mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.12099 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:24 | by ThaDafinser