User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/536.28.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.3 Safari/536.28.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 6.0.3OS X Mountain Lion 10.8Webkit 536.28.6desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.08599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0.3closeOS X 10.8.3desktop-browsercloseclose2.58301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0.3closeOS X 10.8.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.0.3closeMac OS X 10.8.3closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0.3closeOS X 10.8.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.59938 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0.3WebKit 536.28.6Mac OS X 10.8.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59938 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.0.3Webkit 536.28.6OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.8.4Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser