User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; ru; LG-D690 Build/KOT49I.A1413286746) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.9.2.467 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.9Android 4.4unknown LGG3 StylusMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.9U3 Android 4.4LGG3 StylusMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD690mobile-browseryescloseclose1.28253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.9WebKit Android 4.4LGD690smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.9.2closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD690closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose2.81638 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.9.2.467WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.2LGLGD690closeclosecloseclosecloseclose5.70954 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.9Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.2LGG3 Stylusmobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser