User agent detail

Layar/4.0 Android/2.2 (samsung GT-I9010)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Layar 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGalaxy S Giorgio Armanimobile-browseryescloseclose1.33538 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGALAXY S Giorgio Armanismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I9010closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.54453 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy S Giorgio Armanimobile:smartyescloseclose0.06101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.14798 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser