User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible MSIE 7.0 Windows Phone OS 7.0 Trident/3.1 IEMobile/7.0 LG LG-C900)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGLG Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.0GenericWindows Phone 7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22739 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0LGLGsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0LGLGcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0 LG LG-C900closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.43383 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone LGLGC900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.83075 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0LGOptimus 7Qmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser