User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Smart-Tv; Linux; Tizen 2.2.x) AppleWebkit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Tizen 2.2Webkit 538.1SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Tizen 2.2SamsungSmart TVtvyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 538.1Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.459 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.1Tizen 2.2SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser