User agent detail

MOT-V975/80.3F.64I MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV975 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV975Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V975 80.3F.64Icloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV975mobile-browseryescloseclose1.48015 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV975smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV975closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V975closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.563 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV975mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaV975Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04599 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:23 | by ThaDafinser