User agent detail

MOT-W418G/06.14.00[TFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX] Obigo/Q03C MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaW418G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-W418G 06.14.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3close MotorolaW418Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C MotorolaW418Gsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close MotorolaW418Gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C MotorolaW418Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose MotorolaW418GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:22 | by ThaDafinser