User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1; KFFOWI Build/LMY47O) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/45.1.102 like Chrome/45.0.2454.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Silk 45.1Android 5.1unknown AmazonKindle Fire (5th Gen)Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 45.1Blink Android 5.1AmazonKindle Fire (5th Gen)Tabletyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 45.1.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 5.1AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 45.1.102closeAndroid 5.1AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 45.1.102WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 45.1Blink FireOS AmazonFiretabletyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 45closeAndroid 5.1AmazonKFFOWITabletyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:22 | by ThaDafinser