User agent detail

Spice M5364
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
SpiceM5364smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Spice closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SpiceM5364mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SpiceM5364smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SpiceM5364mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SpiceM-5364Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04599 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:22 | by ThaDafinser