User agent detail

HuaweiSymantecSpider/1.0 DSE-support@huaweisymantec.com (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR ; http://www.huaweisymantec.com/cn/IRL/spider)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
HuaweiSymantecSpider 1.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesHuaweiSymantecSpiderBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HuaweiSymantecSpider 1.0closeWindows XP HuaweiSymantecSpidercloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesHuaweiSymantecSpiderCrawler0.219 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.368 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:21 | by ThaDafinser