User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Archos 97 Neon Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos97 Neon Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2Archos97 Neontabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.2Archos97 Neoncloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.094 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.2Archos97 Neontabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.2Archos97 NeonTabletyesyescloseclose0.11499 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:20 | by ThaDafinser