User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo WiiU) AppleWebKit/534.52 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/2.1.0.8.21 NintendoBrowser/1.0.0.7494.US
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/console.yml
NetFront 2.1Nintendo WiiWebKit 534.52NintendoWiiUconsole Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NX 2.1WebKit NintendoWiiUConsoleyes0.30197 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 1.0.0.7494.UScloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nintendo Browser 1.0.0.7494.closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront WebKit Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiUconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX 2.1.0close NintendoWii Ucloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netfront Browser NX 1.0.0.7494.USNetFront 534.52 NintendoNintendo WiiUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.489 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 2.1Webkit 534.52 NintendoWii Ugaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Nintendo Wii U closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWii USmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:20 | by ThaDafinser