User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; xx) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile TizenBrowser/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser 2.0Tizen 2.0Webkit 537.1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TizenBrowser 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen 2.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 537.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser 2.0Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.0closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:20 | by ThaDafinser