User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-369.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 5.1unknown AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.252 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:20 | by ThaDafinser