User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini3.1 (Nokia7100s/06.32)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia7100s Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini3.1close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia7100ssmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 06.32)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 3.1close Nokia7100scloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7100scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 3.1 Series40 Nokia7100 Supernovamobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.19498 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:20 | by ThaDafinser