User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-GB; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 95 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 7.0Gecko Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 95desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.0Gecko 20020823Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:19 | by ThaDafinser