User agent detail

Lynx/2.8.8pre.3 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 OpenSSL/1.0.1e
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Lynx 2.8.8 Text-based Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Lynx 2.8 Linux Desktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lynx 2.8.8pre.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Lynx 2.8.8pre.3close desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Lynx 2.8Text-based 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Lynx 2.8.8pre.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lynx 2.8.8close closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Lynx 2.8.8pre.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Lynx 2.8.8pre.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.447 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Lynx 2.8.8 closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LynxBrowserOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:18 | by ThaDafinser