User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.4.2; en-US; HIGHWAY_SIGNS) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.419 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
UC Browser 9.2.0.419Android 4.4.2 WikoHighway SIGNSsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close IntexAqua 3G+mobile-browseryescloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Android 4.4WikoHighway SIGNSsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.419 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Android 4.4.2WikoHighway Signsmobile:smartyescloseclose0.04201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:16 | by ThaDafinser