User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ10i2/R1x Browser/NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 JavaPlatform/JP-8.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
NetFront 3.5 NetFront Sony EricssonElmfeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront SonyEricssonJ10i2Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ10i2 R1xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SonyEricssonJ10i2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront Sony EricssonElmfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SonyEricssonJ10i2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J10i2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 Sony EricssonElmmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SonyEricssonJ10i2Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:16 | by ThaDafinser