User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows Phone 8.0; Trident/6.0; IEMobile/10.0; ARM; Touch; Juggernaut; 0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Juggernaut0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 10.0Trident 6.0WinPhone8 8.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows GenericWindows Phone 8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 10.0Trident Windows Phone 8.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows Phone 8closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0Juggernaut0closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0Juggernautmobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:16 | by ThaDafinser