User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; msie 9.0; windows phone os 7.5; trident/5.0; iemobile/9.0; samsung; sgh-i917)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungsgh-i917 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 9.0Trident 5.0WinPhone7.5 7.5Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
msie 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 9.0Trident Windows Phone 7.5Samsungsgh-i917smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsungsgh-i917closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0Trident 5.0Windows Phone Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung; sgh-i917mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:15 | by ThaDafinser