User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.3.5; zh-cn; HTC_Sensation_XL_with_Beats_Audio_X315b; 480*800) UCWEB7.9.3.103/139/1002
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensation XL with Beats_Audio_X315b Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCA810emobile-browseryescloseclose0.276 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux HTCSensation XL with Beats Audio X315bsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.3closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCSensation XL with Beats_Audio_X315bcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103 Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3.5HTCSensation XLmobile:smartyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:15 | by ThaDafinser