User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Origyn Web Browser; AmigaOS 4; PPC; U) AppleWebKit/532.0+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/532.0+)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Origyn AmigaOS 4Webkit 532.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.17598 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 532.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OWB closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit AmigaOS desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 532.0close closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeAmigaOS 4closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 532.0Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Origyn Webkit 532.0AmigaOS 4desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:15 | by ThaDafinser