User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) konqueror/4.14.1 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.14.1Linux Webkit 534.34desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.14.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.14WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.14.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.121 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.14.1WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.14.1Webkit 534.34Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:14 | by ThaDafinser