User agent detail

CybEye.com/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.4)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
CybEye 2.0WinXP 5.14.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CybEye 2.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.456 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:14 | by ThaDafinser