User agent detail

SAMSUNG-E2100L/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungE2100L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05099 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-E2100L 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close SamsungE2100Lmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungE2100Lsmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close SamsungE2100Lcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungE2100Lmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungE2100LFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:12 | by ThaDafinser