User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(iPad; U;CPU OS 7 like Mac OS X; zh-CN; iPad2,5) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/2.0.1.280 U3/0.8.0 Safari/7543.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
UC Browser 2.0iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 2.0U3 iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.07199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7543.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7AppleiPad Minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.0WebKit iOS 7AppleiPad Minitabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 7closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.1close AppleiPad2,5closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.0.1.280WebKit 534.46iOS 7AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.484 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.0Webkit 534.46iOS 7AppleiPad minitabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPad MiniTabletyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:12 | by ThaDafinser