User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.1.2; xx; HUAWEI C8813Q) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.2.365 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.4Android 4.1.2Gecko HuaweiAscend C8813mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux MicromaxA111mobile-browseryescloseclose0.282 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Android 4.1HuaweiC8813Qsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.2closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.203 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.2.365 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Android 4.1.2HuaweiAscend C8813mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:12 | by ThaDafinser