User agent detail

Sogou web spider/4.0(+http://www.sogou.com/docs/help/webmasters.htm#07)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-081.php
yesSogou Web SpiderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSogou Web SpiderBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Sogou closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesSogou web spider/4.0close0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesSogou SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSogou web spiderclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyessogou spiderCrawler0.13 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sogou "Search Dog" 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesSogou Web Spiderclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:12 | by ThaDafinser