User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
IE 7.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:12 | by ThaDafinser