User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Compatible, Aggregation, Twonky, 7.1-beta-3665011-Android ) TwonkyMedia-NMC DLNADOC/1.50 mobileview TwonkyBeamBrowser/3.5.4-404 (Android 4.2.2; samsung GT-N5100 Build/JDQ39.N5100XXCMK1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-N5100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Note 8.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.259 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Note 8.0"tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-N5100closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Note 8.0tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:11 | by ThaDafinser