User agent detail

MQQBrowser/40 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B146 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 4.0iOS 6.1.2Webkit 536.26AppleiPhone 4mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 40closeiOS 6.1.2SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 40WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 4smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 40closeiOS 6.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.188 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 40WebKit 536.26iOS 6.1.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.0Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.2AppleiPhone 4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:11 | by ThaDafinser