User agent detail

Android 4.4.2;AppleWebKit/537.36;Build/KOT49H;M-PPxX520U Build/KOT49H
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Android Browser Android 4.4.2WebKit MediacomPhonePad Duo X520Usmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2MediacomPhonePad Duo X520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4MediacomPhonePad Duo X520Usmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2MediacomM-PPxX520Ucloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.2MediacomPhonePad Duo X520mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:11 | by ThaDafinser